ap
An International Peer Reviewed Research Journal
AJP
SSN : 0971 - 3093
Vol 28, No 5, May, 2019
Asian
Journal of Physics
(A Publication Not for Profit)
Volume 28,
No 5 (2019)
CONTENTS
Editorial
Guest
Editorial
About
the Guest Editors
On the
algorithms in phase-shift interferometry
Rajpal
Sirohi
275
What is
“Wrong” with Current Theoretical Physicists?
Francis
T S
Yu
285
Shades
and Reflections of Light
Rajpal
Sirohi
309
Determination
of third-order nonlinear optical response of uracil derivatives
using Z-scan technique
Elizabeth,
I Hubert Joe, M A Palafox and V K
Rastogi
319
Vibrational
spectral study and molecular docking analysis of anticancerous
drug:5-Fluorouracil: A Review
S P
Singh, Prem Kumar, A Milton Franklin Benial, M A Palafox, Kaushal
Rani Nagar and V K Rastogi
329
Asian Journal of
Physics
Vol. 28
No 5, 2019, 275-283
On the algorithms in phase-shift interferometry
Rajpal Sirohi
Physics Department
Alabama A&M University, Huntsville AL 35802, USA
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A number of phase-shift algorithms exist in literature. These are categorized as 3-step, 4-step, 5-step etc. with different but constant values of phase steps. In this paper, it is shown that many of them can be deduced from the generalized theory under each category in literature. © Anita Publications. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Algorithms, Interferometry, Interferogram, Aberrated wavefront
References
1. Malacara Daniel (ed), Optical Shop Testing, 3rd Edn, (Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York), 2007.
2. Sirohi Rajpal S (ed), Speckle Metrology, (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York),1993.
3. Schreiber Horst, Bruning John H, Phase Shifting
Interferometry, in Optical Shop Testing, Malacara Daniel
(ed), (Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York), 2007,pp
547-666.
4. Creath K, Phase-Measurement Interferometry
Techniques, in: Progress in Optics Vol XXVI, E. Wolf Ed,
Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam), 1988, pp
349-393
5. Greivenkamp J E, Generalized Data Reduction for Heterodyne Interferometry, Opt Eng, 23(1984)350-352.
6. Wyant J C,
Koliopoulos C L, Bhushan B, George O E, An Optical Profilometer for
Surface Characterization of Magnetic Media, ASLE
Trans,
27(1984)101-113.
7. Wizinowich P L, Phase shifting interferometry in the presence of vibration: a new algorithm and system, Appl Opt, 29(1900)3211-3279.
8. Carre ́ P, Installation et utilisation du comparateur photoélectrique et Interférentiel du Bureau International des Poids et Measures, Metrologia, 2(1966)13-23.
9. Hariharan P,
Oreb B F, Eiju T, Digital Phase-Shifting Interferometry: A Simple
Error-Compensating Phase Calculation Algorithm, Appl
Opt,
26(1987)2504-2504.
10. Larkin K G, Oreb B F, Design, Assessment of Symmetrical Phase-Shifting Algorithms, J Opt Soc Am A, 9(1992) 1740-1748.
11. Surrel Y, Design of Algorithms for Phase Measurements by the Use of Phase Stepping, Appl Opt, 35(1996)51-60.
12. Hibino K, Oreb B F, Farrant D I, Larkin K G, Phase Shifting for Nonsinusoidal Waveforms With Phase-Shift Errors, J Opt Soc Am A, 12(1995)761-768.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Asian
Journal of Physics
Vol. 28
No 5, 2019, 285-307
What is
“Wrong” with Current Theoretical
Physicists?
Francis
T S Yu
Emeritus
Evan Pugh (University) Professor of Electrical
Engineering
Penn
State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Theoretical
physics uses amazing mathematical paradigm and added with fantastic
computer animation provides very convincing results. But
mathematical modeling and computer animation are virtual and
fictitious, for which many of analytical solutions are not
physically real. What is wrong with current theoretical physicists
is that they have used mostly a timeless (t = 0) mathematical
subspace for their analyses that is not existed within our temporal
(t > 0) universe. The reason is: It is not how rigorous and
fancies the mathematics (or computer simulation) are; it is the
essence of a physical realizable paradigm. For instance; timeless
(t = 0) model has been used since the beginning of science;
although it has produced uncountable excellent results but, it has
also produced many solutions that are timeless (t = 0) or
non-existent solutions within our temporal (t > 0) universe. In
this article, I will give a few evidences where the
theoretical analyses done by the world renowned theoretical
scientists; past and present, have done something wrong to physics.
Yet, theoretical physicists were and still are the creators for all
the fundamental laws and principles of physics, it is their
“responsibility” to take us back to the physically realizable world
of science; otherwise we will be still trapped within a virtual
timeless (t = 0) land of mathematics. © Anita Publications. All
rights reserved.
Keywords:
Theoretical Physics, Temporal Space, Timeless Space, Virtual Space,
Newtonian Space, Physical Realizable, Quantum Mechanics, Cosmology,
Relativity.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Asian Journal of
Physics
Vol. 28
No 5, 2019, 309-317
Shades and Reflections of Light
Rajpal Sirohi
Alabama A&M University, Huntsville, USA
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The paper endeavours the history of light and optics from the early Greek period and discusses the contributions made by philosophers and later by scientists in understanding the properties of light. Many of the thoughts expressed by Philosophers and Scientists about the nature of light have been taken from the Internet. © Anita Publications. All rights reserved.
Keywords: EM spectrum, Rectilinear propagation, Reflection, Refraction
References
1. Raha S, Sinha B, Sinha D K, Mukherjee S P, History of Science in India, (The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, Kolkata), 2014.
2. Einstein A, Zum gegenwärtigen Stand des Strahlungsproblem, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10(1909)185-193.
3. Raman C V, Nagendra Nath N S, The diffraction of light by high frequency sound waves: Part I, Proc Indian Acad Sci, A2(1936)406-412
4. Einstein A, Strahlungs-emission und -absorption nach der Quantentheorie, Verh der Deutsch Phys Gesell, 18(1916)318-323.
5. Gordon J P, Zeiger H J, Townes C H, Molecular
Microwave Oscillator and New Hyperfine Structure in the Microwave
Spectrum of NH3, Phys Rev,
95(1954)282-284.
6. Maiman T H, Stimulated Optical Radiation in Ruby, Nature, 187(1960)493-494.
7. Javan A, Bennett W R(Jr), Herriott D R, Population
Inversion and Continuous Optical Maser Oscillation in a Gas
Discharge Containing a He-Ne Mixture,
Phys Rev Letts, 6(1961)106-110.
8. White A D, Rigden J D, Continuous gas maser operation in the visible, Proc IRE, 50(1962), 1697; doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1962.288018 0096-8390.
9. Stetson K A, Powell R L, Interferometric Vibration Analysis by Wavefront Reconstruction, J Opt Soc Am, 55(1965)1593-1598.
10. Brown B R, Lohmann A W, Complex Spatial Filtering with Binary Masks, Appl Opt, 5(1966)967-969.
11. Leendertz J A, Interferometric displacement measurement on scattering surfaces utilizing speckle effect, J Phys E (Sci Instrum), 3(1970)214-218.
12. Pierre Ambs, Optical Computing: A 60-Year Adventure, Advances in Optical Technologies, Volume 2010, Article ID 372652, doi:10.1155/2010/372652
13. Kao K C, Hockham G A, Dielectric-fibre surface waveguides for optical frequencies, Proc IEE, 113(1966)1151-1158; doi. 10.1049/piee.1966.0189
14. Franken P A, Hill A E, Peters C W, Weinreich G, Generation of optical harmonics, Phys Rev Letts,7(1961)118-119.
15. Korpel Adrianus, Acousto-Optics – A Review of Fundamentals, Proc IEEE, 69(1981)48-53; doi. 10.1109/PROC.1981.11919
16. Holonyak N (Jr), Bevacqua S F, Coherent (visible) light emission from Ga(As1-xPx) junctions, Appl Phys Letts, 1(1962)82-83.
17.
Nakamura S, Mukai T, Senoh M, Candela-Class High-Brightness
InGaN/AlGaN Double-Heterostructure Blue-Light-Emitting-Diodes,
Appl Phys Letts,
64(1994)1687-1689.
18.
Charge-coupled device – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki
› Charge-coupled_device
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
© ANITA PUBLICATIONS
All rights reserved
Designed & Maintained by
Manoj
Kumar